Effect of oral nutritional supplementation on the post-discharge nutritional status and quality of life of gastrointestinal cancer patients after surgery: a multi-center study.

Department of General Surgery, Beijing Hospital, National Geriatrics Center, Beijing, China. zhumw2013@163.com. Department of General Surgery, Beijing Hospital, National Geriatrics Center, Beijing, China. Department of General Surgery, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China. Department of General Surgery, Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China. Department of General Surgery, Nanfang Hospital Affiliated to Southern Medicine University, Guangzhou, China. Department of General Surgery, Ruijin Hospital Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China. Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Shanghai Sixth Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.

Asia Pacific journal of clinical nutrition. 2019;(3):450-456

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES To evaluate the effect of oral nutritional supplementation (ONS) on the postdischarge nutritional status and quality of life (QoL) of gastrointestinal cancer patients after surgery. METHODS AND STUDY DESIGN A multi-center study was conducted on gastrointestinal cancer patients who received surgical treatment from 2013-2015. All patients were screened using the Nutrition Risk Screening 2002 (NRS 2002) to assess nutritional risk. Patients with nutritional risk were randomized into two groups: patients in the study group (n=55) were given dietary guidance and ONS, control group (n=59) received only dietary guidance. Anthropometric measurements, nutrition-related laboratory tests, and gastrointestinal function scores were also collected and analyzed using Student's t test and analysis of variance (ANOVA). In addition, the EQ-5D was used to evaluate patients' QoL. RESULTS Compared with baseline measurements, the body weight of patients in the study group increased by 1.35±0.53 kg and 1.35±0.73 kg at 60 and 90 days, which were significantly higher than those in the control group (-1.01±0.54 kg, and -1.60±0.81 kg at 60 and 90 days). The results from ANOVA showed that only weight and BMI differed significantly between the study and control groups and also between different measurement times (p<0.01). No differences were found for the other indicators or QoL between the study groups. CONCLUSIONS ONS may improve the weight and BMI of surgically treated gastrointestinal cancer patients postdischarge. However, these effects had little impact on patients' QoL.

Methodological quality

Metadata